Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 D.C. 35

Davis v. Beverly and Riggs

Decided December 15, 1811

Assumpsit, for work and labor. contended that as the plaintiff had proved that the work and labor were done for the private banking association, called “ The Union Bank of Georgetown,” he was bound by the fourteenth article of that association, which declares that every person dealing with them “ disavows having recourse, on any pretence whatever, to the person, or separate property of any present or future member of this company,” and ■could not recover in this action…

Decided 1811-12-15

¶1But

the CouRT

¶2(nem. con.) said that at the most it could only be considered as a contract on the part of the plaintiff, that he would not enforce his judgment against the person or property of the defendants; a contract which was binding on his conscience, and which they could not presume he would violate ; and if he attempted to violate it, a court of equity might grant an injunction.

/2/dc/35 · .json · Public domain