Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 D.C. 444

Cazenove v. Darrel

Decided November 15, 1823

The note was for $56.84. The warrant was for $50. Caze-nove, at the trial, admitted payment of $6.84.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1823-11-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1903

1 state decisions

20182318301840185018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Morsell, J.

¶1Can consent give jurisdiction ? If, in order to give original jurisdiction to this Court, the parties should agree that the debt was 56 dollars, when the real debt was less than 50 dollars, could the jurisdiction of this Court be supported ?

¶2The Court

(Thruston, J., absent,)

¶3said they still considered the real debt, in this case, to be $56.84, and that the judgment must be reversed, and judgment of nonsuit entered with costs.

/2/dc/444 · .json · Public domain