¶1upon the authority of the cases cited by Mr. Lee, refused to quash the executions, upon the ground that the first executions had been countermanded at the request of the defendant, and by way of indulgence. (See also the ease of Noland v. Cromwell's Lessee, 6 Mun. 185, 187.)
2 D.C. 521
Muncaster v. Mason
Decided December 15, 1824
Rule to show cause why four executions, in favor of Muncas-ter against Mason and Jones, should not be quashed, because issued more than a year and day after judgment. showed for cause, as to two of the executions, thatthe plaintiff had been delayed by injunction obtained by the defendant, Mason, and finally dissolved under a mandate from the Supreme Court of the United States ; and as to the two other executions, that the plaintiff’ had issued his executions in due time, but…
Decided 1824-12-15