Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Denio 196

Brown v. Ferguson

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1846

New York Supreme Court · decided 1846-02-15

Covenant for rent in arrear. After an attorney had been retained to.bring the suit, and he had drawn and sent away the declaration to be filed, but before the declaration was filed or served, the defendant tendered a sum of money which turned out on the trial to be sufficient to pay the debt; and he also tendered a further sum sufficient to pay the costs which had then accrued. But he did not bring the money into court.

Relies on Slack v. Brown · Retan v. Drew

Decided 1846-02-15

By the Court, Bronson, Ch. J.

¶1The statute only authorizes a tender after a suit has been commenced. (2 R. S. 553, § 20—23.) Whether in such a cáse the money should be1 brought into court, we need not now inquire. (See Slack v Brown, 13 Wend. 390; Graham v. Gedney, Grah. Pr. 544, note, 2d ed. This was a tender before suit brought; and it was not available to the defendant, for thereason that the money was not brought into court. It is true that the plaintiff had incurred costs prior to the tender which the defendant was bound to pay. (Retan v. Drew, 19 Wend. 304.) But the suit was not commenced until the declaration was filed and served. (Johnson v. Comstock, 6 Hill, 10.) On a common law tender the money must be brought into court. This disposes of the principal part of the motion. But there should be a retaxation of the plaintiffs bill of costs.

¶2Ordered accordingly.

/2/denio/196 · .json · Public domain