¶1Upon the strength of adjudged cases (Massey v. Gillilan, 1. Paige’s C. R. 644; Fulton v. Rosevelt Ib. 178.) and what is said by Mr. Hoffman, in his Practice (1. vol. 201) let an order be entered requiring the security referred to in the order of the fourteenth of July last to be perfected within thirty days or that the bill be dismissed.
2 Edw. Ch. 217
Bridges v. Canfield
Decided October 20, 1834
New York Court of Chancery · decided 1834-10-20
Complainants were non-residents. They had given security for costs to the amount of five hundred dollars ; but, in consequence of a surety becoming insolvent, an order was made on the fourteenth day of July one thousand eight hundred and thirty four requiring the complainants to file fresh security.
Decided 1834-10-20