Gilbert Hubbard & Co. v. Roach’s Empirical Analysis
2 F. 393 · 1880
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently April 1987
3 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Of the same nature (maritime) is the charge for storing the sails, or other furniture, in a storehouse on shore, and that hind of rent or storage is also the subject of a maritime action.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. Plummer““The storage of sails, when stripped from the vessel, is not a service pertaining to her navigation, and a claim for such storage is not a subject of admiralty jurisdiction.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Davidson v. Plummer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.