Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.1d 733 - In re Ah Chong

In re Ah Chong’s Empirical Analysis

2 F. 733 · 1880

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
June 1948
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1948

1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

501880189019001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McCready v. Virginia · In re Parrott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * To exclude the Chinaman from fishing in the waters of the state, therefore, while the Germans, Italians, Englishmen, and Irishmen, who otherwise stand upon the same footing, are permitted to fish ad libitum, without price, charge, let, or hindrance, is to prevent him from enjoying the same privileges as are ‘enjoyed by the citizens or subjects of the most favored nation’; and to punish him criminally for fishing in the waters of the state, while all aliens of the Caucasian .race are permitted to fish freely in the same waters with Impunity and without restraint, and exempt from all punishments, is to exclude him from enjoying the same immunities and exemptions ‘as are enjoyed by the citizens or subjects of the most favored nationand such discriminations are in violation of articles 5 and 6 of the treaty with China, cited in full in Parrott’s Case, The same privileges which are granted to other aliens, by treaty or otherwise, are secured to the Chinaman by the stipulations of the treaty. Conceding that the state may exclude all aliens from fishing in its waters, yet if it permits one class to enjoy the privilege it must permit all others to enjoy, upon like terms, the same privileges, whose governments have treaties securing to them the enjoyment of all privileges granted to the most favored nation. “The Fourteenth Amendment of the national Constitution provides that ‘no state shall * * * deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.’ To ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““ * * * All aliens incapable of becoming electors of this state are hereby-prohibited from Ashing, or taking any Ash, lobsters, shrimps, or shellAsh of any kind, for the purpose of selling or giving to another person to sell. Every violation of the provisions of this act shall be a misdemeanor, punishable upon conviction by a fine of not less than $25, or by imprisonment in the countj jail for a period of not less than thirty days.” 2 Fed. at page 734.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.