Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 F.2d 1013

Docket No. 1679.

Keith v. Land

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted November 13, 1924.

Decided December 1, 1924.)

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1924-12-01

2 counsel of record

Relies on Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co. · Chapman v. Wintroath · 45 App. D.C. 211 - In re Fritts

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1924-12-01

¶1C. C. Bulkley, W. A. Scott, and C. M. Candy, all of Chicago, Ill., and C. D. Davis, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

¶2G. A. Yanoehowski, of Chicago, Ill., for appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4This appeal is from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, awarding priority of invention to appellee, Land. The decision is based upon a motion by appellee for judgment, on the ground that appellants, having delayed four years after the grant of the patent in issue to Land before presenting the claims and seeking an interference, are gnilty of laches, and therefore estopped from claiming the invention. In the absence of any satisfactory reason for delay, the decision of the Commissioner of Patents is affirmed, on the authority of Chapman v. Wintroath, 252 U. S. 126, 40 S. Ct. 234, 64 L. Ed. 491; In re Fritts, 45 App. D. C. 211; Webster Electric Co. v. Splitdorf Electrical Co., 264 U. S. 463, 44 S. Ct. 342, 68 L. Ed. 792.

/2/f2d/1013 · .json · Public domain