Carr v. George E. Warren Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.2d 333 · 1924
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently November 2000
5 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Piedmont & Georges Creek Coal Co. v. Seaboard Fisheries Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“85 per cent. of the coal was sold directly for use of the steamers named, and so billed to the vessels, and received and used by them,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“In this case, the coal was actually purchased on the credit of the steamers, billed to the steamers, and used by them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“the coal was placed on the piers at which the steamers coaled, and was all taken and used by them.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.