Fineran v. Bailey’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.2d 363 · 1924
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently March 1966
4 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Covington & Cincinnati Bridge Co. v. Hager · Rosenbaum v. Bauer · Knapp v. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. · Walton v. House of Representatives of Oklahoma · Creager v. Bryan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A federal court has no power to issue a writ of mandamus, except in aid of jurisdiction previously acquired.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.