In re Weick’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.2d 647 · 1924
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently November 2011
4 federal appellate · 2 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Burlingham v. Crouse · Cohen v. Samuels · Cohn v. Malone
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““* * * the wife or children, or any relative dependent upon such person * * (Emphasis ours.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. In re Messinger · In re Piero““... [T]he courts of Ohio, for the purpose of maintaining the home, and insofar as possible, preventing pauperism and illiteracy, have uniformly given a liberal construction to all exemption statutes for the benefit of the debtor’s family””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““Under §9394 GC, an endowment life insurance policy payable to bankrupt’s beneficiary was exempt, notwithstanding the endowment clause, where endowment term would not expire until 1958.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.