Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.2d 691 - Daugherty v. United States

Daugherty v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.2d 691 · 1924

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
February 1971
most recently cited

24 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 1971 · most notably United States v. Crawford (1971), Haussener v. United States (1925)

24 federal appellate · 2 district ·

100192419301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Patterson · Howard v. United States · Wallace v. United States · Manning v. United States · Rothman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Sentences in criminal cases should reveal with fair certainty the intent of the court and exclude any serious misapprehensions by those who must execute them. The elimination of every possible doubt cannot be demanded. Tested by this standard, the judgment here questioned was sufficient to impose total imprisonment for 15 years made up of three 5-year terms, one under the first count, one under the second, and one under the third, to be served consecutively, and to follow each other in the same sequence as the counts appeared in the indictment. This is the reasonable and natural implication from the whole entry. The words, ‘said term of imprisonment to run consecutively and not concurrently,’ are not consistent with a five-year sentence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.