Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.2d 778 - In re Eberhardt

In re Eberhardt’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.2d 778 · 1924

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
February 1925
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Relies on Haddock v. Plymouth Coal Co. · In re Eberhardt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under such circumstances, we do not feel that the exception should be sustained, unless we are required to do so by an inflexible rule of law. No such rule exists, as we think, which is applicable to the faets of the present matter. True, the general proposition advanced by the exceptant, to the effect that a trustee must account for profits arising out of the investment of the trust fund, is not to be questioned; but it is not applicable to the situation here presented. The accountant was appointed receiver of an estate in bankruptcy, and as such was required to anticipate the necessity of the payment of all funds of the estate to the trustee within a short time. Its own banking department was an authorized depository for bankruptcy funds, and the moneys of the estate were deposited to the credit of the receiver with that department, in a general fund from which loans were made and from which a profit was made, it is true, but nevertheless subject to immediate payment to the trustee or upon order of the court. Under such circumstances proration of the earning value of the funds in question with that of the various other funds in the bank and loaned by it would be practically, if not altogether, impossible. In view of the fact that the great majority of the creditors of the bankrupt, with knowledge of the matter, have acquiesced in the arrangement by which the receiver was compensated for its services (as receiver and liquidating agent) by its qualified use of the funds, and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.