Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.2d 985 - In re Douglas Lumber Co.

In re Douglas Lumber Co.’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.2d 985 · 1924

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
April 1964
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently April 1964

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

3019241930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bailey v. Baker Ice Machine Co. · Prentice v. Duluth Storage & Forwarding Co. · In re Bazemore · Crumrine v. Reynolds · American Laundry Machinery Co. v. Everybody's Laundry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * trustees, as to all property in the custody or coming into the custody of the bankruptcy court, shall be deemed vested with all the rights, remedies, and powers of a creditor holding a lien by legal or equitable proceedings thereon.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.