United States v. Wright’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.3d 175 · 1993
Citation profile
17 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently April 2015
17 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 115 · 18 U.S.C. § 3565 · 18 U.S.C. § 3583 · 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000) · 21 U.S.C. § 844 (§ 404 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on White v. Anchor Motor Freight, Inc. · United States v. Montenegro-Rojo · United States v. Stephenson · United States v. Smith · United States v. Purvis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he sentence imposed by the district court for the violation of supervised release is not an abuse of discretion, even if when combined with the defendant's original sentence it exceeds the statutory maximum for the underlying offense.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“require the defendant to serve in prison all or part of the term of supervised release ... without credit for time previously served on postrelease supervision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“§ 3583 authorizes the revocation of supervised release even where the resulting incarceration, when combined with the period of time the defendant has already served for his substantive offense, will exceed the maximum incarceration permissible under the substantive statute”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.