Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.3d 322 - Ramsden v. United States

Ramsden v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.3d 322 · 1993

Citation profile

80
cited by 80 later decisions
1
states following
April 2017
most recently cited

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 80 later decisions — most recently April 2017 · most notably United States of America v. Ceverilo Chambers (1999), United States v. Kama (2005)

45 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions

400199320002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Relies on Washington v. Chrisman · Samuel Moore & Co. v. Multiflex, Inc. · United States v. Whitten · Paton v. Prade · United States v. Martinson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 80 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) whether the Government displayed a callous disregard for the constitutional rights of the movant; (2) whether the movant has an individual interest in and need for the property he wants returned; (3) whether the movant would be irreparably injured by denying return of the property; and (4) whether the movant has an adequate remedy at law for the redress of his grievance.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “aggrieved by an unlawful search and seizure”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “'[R]easonableness under all the circumstances must be the test when a person seeks to obtain the return of property.'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.