Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.3d 645 - United States v. Farley

United States v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.3d 645 · 1993

Citation profile

75
cited by 75 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 2022
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 75 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently March 2022 · most notably United States v. Carroll (1994), United States v. Latouf (1997)

31 federal appellate · 2 district ·

3101993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1951 (Hobbs Act) · 18 U.S.C. § 2 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Agurs · Giglio v. United States · Holland v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 75 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “attacks on witness credibility are simply challenges to the quality of the government's evidence and not to the sufficiency of the evidence”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[c]ircumstantial evidence is entitled to the same weight as direct evidence in this calculus [of determining sufficiency]. United States v. Gallo, 763 F.2d 1504 , 1518 (6th Cir.1985).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.