United States v. Payne’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.3d 706 · 1993
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 51 later decisions — most recently August 2017 · most notably United States v. Carroll (1994), Clarence Moore v. Willis Morton, Administrator Peter G. Verniero, Attorney General of the State of New Jersey (2001)
29 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 1700 · 18 U.S.C. § 1701 · 18 U.S.C. § 1711 · 18 U.S.C. § 201 (Bank Bribery Amendments)
Relies on Allen v. McCurry · Burks v. United States · Berger v. United States · United States v. Young · Ashe v. Swenson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 51 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“for the reasons stated in Reed "). 14 Our sister circuits have identified sound policy reasons for adopting such a rule. First, barring a defendant's prosecution for misappropriation of postal funds would transform the Double Jeopardy Clause into "a forum-shopping tool for government employees who have violated the law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“'federal court presiding over a criminal trial [has] granted preclusive effect to a prior administrative ruling contrary to the Government's position in the criminal case.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'Inappropriate prosecutorial comments, standing alone, would not justify a reviewing court to reverse a criminal conviction obtained in an otherwise fair proceeding.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.