Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.3d 752 - Ball v. City of Chicago

Ball v. City of Chicago’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.3d 752 · 1993

Citation profile

161
cited by 161 later decisions
3
states following
December 2020
most recently cited

95 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 161 later decisions — most recently December 2020 · most notably Otis v. City of Chicago (1994), United States v. West Grand Avenue Chicago Illinois (1994)

95 federal appellate · 3 state decisions

7101993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Link v. Wabash Railroad · Carey v. Piphus · Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc. · United States v. Boyle

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 161 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is plain that the plaintiff's lawyer knew that he faced dismissal of his case.”
    12 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “only if it is plain either that the dismissal was a mistake or that the judge did not consider factors essential to the exercise of a sound discretion.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “should ... take full and careful account of the frequency and magnitude of the plaintiff's failures to comply with deadlines,”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.