United States v. Brooks’s Empirical Analysis
2 F.3d 838 · 1993
Citation profile
34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2010 · most notably David Weber/appellant v. Strippit Inc (1999), United States v. Romain (2004)
34 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act)
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Batson v. Kentucky · New York v. Belton · Hernandez v. New York · Illinois v. Rodriguez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A defendant who raises a Batson claim must make a prima facie showing that the prosecutor exercised peremptory challenges on the basis of race. Hernandez v. New York, [500] U.S. [352], [358-60], 111 S.Ct. 1859 , 1866, 114 L.Ed.2d 395 (1991) (plurality). If the defendant makes this showing, the burden shifts to the prosecutor to give a race-neutral explanation for striking the prospective jurors in question. Id. A prosecutor’s explanation for a strike is considered race neutral if the explanation is facially based on something other than the juror’s race, i.e., if discriminatory intent is not inherent in the stated reason. Id. After the defendant has a chance to develop a record showing the prosecutor’s reason is pretextual, United States v. Alvarado-Sandoval, 997 F.2d 491 , 491-93 (8th Cir.1993), the district court must decide whether the defendant carried the burden of proving purposeful discrimination, Hernandez, [500] U.S. [358-60], 111 S.Ct. at 1866 . We review a district court’s rulings on Batson claims for clear error. United States v. Day, 949 F.2d 973 , 979 (8th Cir.1991).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“following a consensual or otherwise lawful entry into a private dwelling”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“whether the defendant carried the burden of proving purposeful discrimination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Moran v. Clarke
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.