Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 F.3d 918 - Johnson v. Shalala

Johnson v. Shalala’s Empirical Analysis

2 F.3d 918 · 1993

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
April 2022
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 7 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently April 2022 · most notably Barber v. Hawai'i (1994), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. Shalala (1997)

11 federal appellate · 7 district ·

1801993200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · Weinberger v. Salfi · Califano v. Yamasaki · Heckler v. Ringer · Bowen v. City of New York

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The claim must be (1) collateral to a substantive claim of entitlement (collaterality), (2) colorable in its showing that denial of relief will cause irreparable harm (irreparability), and (3) one whose resolution would not serve the purposes of exhaustion (futility).”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “A claim is collateral if it is not essentially a claim for benefits.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “erase either the experience or the entire effect of several months without food, shelter or other necessities.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.