United States v. Robert Caesar’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2251 (Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996) · 18 U.S.C. § 2252 · 18 U.S.C. § 3231 · 18 U.S.C. § 3731
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Illinois v. Gates · United States v. Leon · Edwards v. Arizona · Stone v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“To trigger the exclusionary rule, police conduct must be sufficiently deliberate that exclusion can meaningfully deter it, and sufficiently culpable that such deterrence is worth the price paid by the justice system.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“further refine[ments to] the [Leon] good faith exception, placing the culpability of the officer's misconduct at the center of the deterrence analysis”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[i]t could be said that these [cases] . . . further narrowed the scope of the exclusionary rule”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.