Anniken Prosser v. Xavier Becerra’s Empirical Analysis
2021
Citation profile
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Wisconsin Eastern District Court)
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395K (§ 1832 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395M (§ 1834 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 1395P (§ 1837 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Whitmore v. Arkansas · Spokeo, Inc. v. Robins · Clapper v. Amnesty International USA · Department Of Commerce v. New York
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.