Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 FAPPX 576 - Wilson v. Lear Corp.

Wilson v. Lear Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
January 2021
most recently cited

1 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 29 U.S.C. § 623 (§ 4 of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967)

Relies on Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc. · Hazen Paper Co. v. Biggins · Radue v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. · Anderson v. Baxter Healthcare Corp. · Hartley v. Wisconsin Bell, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An 'early career person' designation does not necessarily refer to age.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.