¶1admitted that the question, as a judicial one, was new, and of some difficulty; but it being, as he stated, his opinion that a man could not throw off his natural allegiance except in assuming some new citizenship, he refused to dismiss the case in a summary way, for want of jurisdiction. And there being no disputed facts in the case, he directed a verdict for the plaintiff, giving leave, however, to the defendant to move to set it aside if he desired. The motion was made; but Byrne having actually abandoned this country soon after the suit was brought, and there not being any like*427lihood whatever of his return, the case was not heard of further.
2 F. Cas. 423
Baird v. Byrne
Decided October 15, 1854
United States Circuit Court · decided 1854-10-15
By the act of congress, on the subject of raturalization, (Act April 14, 1802, c. 28, § 1; 2 Stat. 153,) any alien, being a free white person, may become a citizen of the United States by declaring… Held: under the provision that the court shall have jurisdiction in controversies between citizens of different states, that neither the District of Columbia, nor a territory, is a state within the meaning of the constitution. Seton v. Hanham, Charlt.
Decided 1854-10-15