Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 FLA 207 - Ponder v. Moseley

Ponder v. Moseley’s Empirical Analysis

1848

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
3
states following
August 1971
most recently cited

1 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 1971

1 district · 12 state decisions

4018481850186018701880189019001910192019301940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[When] a court has jurisdiction [of the person and subject matter], it has a right to decide every question which occurs in the cause, and whether [this] decision be correct or otherwise, its judgment until reversed is regarded as binding in every other court.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.