2 F. Supp. 2d 22 - Thomas v. Network Solutions, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
6 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 31 U.S.C. § 9701 (Treasury Forfeiture Fund Act of 1992) · 42 U.S.C. § 1861 (Academic Research Facilities Modernization Act of 1988) · 42 U.S.C. § 1862 · 42 U.S.C. § 1870 · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946)
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Conley v. Gibson · Reno v. American Civil Liberties Union · Otter Tail Power Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(b) The head of each agency (except a mixed-ownership Government corporation) may prescribe regulations establishing the charge for a service or thing of value provided by the agency. Regulations prescribed by the heads of executive agencies are subject to policies prescribed by the President and shall be as uniform as practicable. Each charge shall be-— (1) fair; and (2) based on— (A) the costs to the Government; (B) the value of the service or thing to the recipient; (C) public policy or interest served; and (D) other relevant facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.