2 F. Supp. 2d 562 - Fund for Animals v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 2010
2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 16 U.S.C. § 669 (Federal Aid in Wildlife Restoration Act) · 16 U.S.C. § 669G · 42 U.S.C. § 4321 (§ 2 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969) · 42 U.S.C. § 4332 (§ 102 of the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe · Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources Council · Doerr v. Doerr · Jackson Dairy, Inc. v. H. P. Hood & Sons, Inc.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.