Du Daobin v. Cisco Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 774 · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · International Shoe Co. v. Washington · United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Baker v. Carr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“developmental actions relevant to the [alleged law of nations violation] took place predominantly, if not entirely, within the United States,” and”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.