2 Haw. App. 259 - State v. Alsip’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

8 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “It is well-settled that in reviewing a decision rendered in a case tried by the court without a jury, an appellate court will indulge every reasonable presumption in favor of findings made by the court below as the basis of its decision and in the absence of specific findings, every finding of fact necessary to support the decision appealed from will be presumed to have been made.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. 2 Haw. App. 369 - State v. Napoleon

2. “in favor of the correctness of the court's ultimate conclusions.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Pereira