Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Haw. App. 538 - Lee v. Masamitsu Kimura

2 Haw. App. 538 - Lee v. Masamitsu Kimura’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
November 2020
most recently cited

2 district · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently November 2020

2 district · 16 state decisions

8019811990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shinn v. Edwin Yee, Ltd. · Stahl v. Balsara · Harkins v. Ikeda · Lennen & Newell, Inc. v. Clark Enterprises, Inc. · 2 Haw. App. 265 - Title Guaranty Escrow Services, Inc. v. Powley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The defense of the statute [of frauds] is a personal one which may undoubtedly be waived by the defendant, and unless he [or she] sets up the statute and relies on it by some proper pleading, he [or she] thereby impliedly waives the objection that the contract was not in writing. Under the generally prevailing rule that an oral contract within the statute of frauds is not void or illegal, but merely voidable, and that the statute affords a defense personal to the party sought to be charged, which cannot be availed of by anyone else, the defense of the statute may be waived by the party entitled thereto, as by failure to raise the objection by proper pleading, objection to evidence, or otherwise in accordance with the prevailing local practice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.