Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 H. & J. 345

Davis v. Wilson

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 15, 1806

Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1806-06-15

The record in this case contained a bill of exceptions, tendered to the associate justices of the county court by the defendant, (die appellant,) and which was signed, but not sealed,, by the justices.

Decided 1806-06-15

Tnw Court

¶1were about to reverse the judgment on the form of proceedings, and to award a, procedendo, when

¶2W. Dorsey contended, that a procedendo ought not to be awarded in a case where the court do not reverse on a bill of exceptions.

The Court

¶3considered that there was no bill of exceptions in the case, the seals of the justices not being affixed (hereto; but there was error in the form of proceeding, and reversed the judgment without awarding & procedendo*

¶4JUDGMENT REVERSED»

/2/hj/345 · .json · Public domain