Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 ILLAPP 223 - Sterl v. Sterl

Sterl v. Sterl’s Empirical Analysis

1878

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
8
states following
April 1960
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1960

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

201878188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Way v. Way

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘. . . No person shall he entitled to a divorce in pursuance of the provisions of this act, who has not resided in the State one whole year, next before filing his or her bill or petition, . . . ’ ” (Italics ours.)”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““In this case the jurisdiction of the court is invoked by the appellee, he having, as he had a legal right to do, filed his bill against appellant, praying relief and summoning the appellant into the court. When she is thus brought in, and, having responded to the claims of the appellee by answering his bill of complaint, being as it were, then forced into the court, submits herself to its jurisdiction, and asks the court to .grant to her certain equitable rights, to which she claims to be entitled, then it is that the appellee challenges the jurisdiction of the court to grant to her any equitable rights, but continues to clamor for his. This position is unconscionable and indefensible upon the principles of equity. * * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.