¶1This was a suit in replevin by appellee against appellants, to recover certain personal property of which she claimed to be the owner.
¶2Defendants attempt to justify the talcing by showing that they were constables, and took the property on executions in their hands issued against W. H. Travel*, husband of appellee, •and allege that the property in controversy was the property of defendant in said executions.
¶3On the trial appellants failed to show that any judgments had been rendered against W. H. Travel*, upon which said executions were issued.
¶4When the officer is sued in trespass by the defendant in execution the production of the execution is a sufficient defense for his protection. But when the execution is levied upon property claimed by a third party, to justify, he must show that the execution is based on valid judgment. Johnson v. Holloway, 82 Ill. 334; Hartman v. Cochrane, Appellate Court, 3d District, May Term, 1878, (2 Bradwell, 592;) Jackson v. Hobson, 4 Scam. 411.
¶5Judgment affirmed.