Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ill. Cir. Ct. 47

Anonymous

Illinois Circuit Court

Decided July 1, 1877

Illinois Circuit Court · decided 1877-07-01

<p>Practice. 1. Leave to reply double — Replication de injuria, when allowable. 2. Notice of motion — When necessary.</p>

Decided 1877-07-01

¶1Counsel: I ask leave to reply double.

Gary, J.:

¶2Have you given any notice of the application to reply double?

¶3Counsel: You gave me leave to reply.

¶4Gaby, J.: I gave you leave to reply, but that was not a double application. Why don’t you reply generally? The replication de injuña would be applicable in that ease. ■ Look in Smith’s Leading Cases as to the replication de injuria as to the action of assumpsit. Crogate’s Case, 1 Smith’s Lead. Cas. part I, pp. 247-262. I don’t make any order without notice to the other side. I don’t give leave to reply double without notice. Whenever there is necessity to apply to the court there must be notice to the other side.

/2/illcirct/47 · .json · Public domain