Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ind. 160

Reed v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1850

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1850-05-15

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1850-05-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently September 1985

5 state decisions

2018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1DEBT upon a judgment. Pleas — nul tiel record and payment. Issues. On the trial the defendant introduced *161Caleb B. Smith as a witness, who stated “ that some time ago Irvin Rcecl, one of the plaintiffs, (the two plaintiffs being partners,) called upon witness, who was an attorney at law, with the purpose of employing him as attorney to bring suit on Mr. Kay’s official bond, as justice of the peace. Witness told him the securities were good for the money, and he could collect it. No fee was paid him, and circumstances prevented his bringing said suit; but, at the time above mentioned, and in said consultation, Reed, plaintiff, made statements in regard to the subject matter of said suit, which the defendant in the present suit proposed to prove against said Reed, plaintiff. The Court permitted said Smith to testify thereto. Held, that the circumstances rendered the communications privileged, and Smith should have been precluded from testifying to them.

J. S. Newman, for the plaintiffs.S. W. Parker, for the defendant.

¶2The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

/2/ind/160 · .json · Public domain