Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Ind. 285

State v. Lackey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1850

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1850-11-26

<p>The act of 1849, giving exclusive jurisdiction to justices in certain cases, contained no clause saving pending suits, and the Circuit Courts, after the passage of that act, had no jurisdiction of such causes.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently November 1871

1 state decisions

Relies on Taylor v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1850-11-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Blackford, J.

¶1Indictment for lewdness.

¶2This indictment was found in the Hamilton Circuit Court, at the September term, 1848. It was quashed at the September term, 1849, on the ground that the Court had no jurisdiction of the cause.

¶3At the time this indictment was found, the Hamilton Circuit Court had jurisdiction of the suit. R. S. 1843, p. 977, s. 81.

¶4In January, 1849, an act passed giving to justices of the peace exclusive jurisdiction, in Hamilton county, over offences like the present one. That act took effect from its passage. Acts of 1849, p. 78.

¶5There being no clause in the act of 1849 for the saving of pending suits, the Circuit Court, after the passage of that act, had no jurisdiction of the indictment. Any subsequent proceedings in the case would have been coram non judice and void. The indictment, therefore, was correctly quashed, at the September term, 1849, for want of jurisdiction. Taylor v. The State, 7 Blackf. 93.

Per Curiam.

¶6-The judgment is affirmed.

/2/ind/285 · .json · Public domain