¶1As a term and more intervened between the teste and return of the writ, it is a mere nullity.
¶2Rule granted.
¶3 3 Wil. 341. Parsons v. Lloyd. 2 Bl. Rep. 845.
¶4 2 Ld. Ray. 775. Shirley v. Wright.
¶5[a] Though this is the law in respect to mesneprocess by arrest in personal actions, yet a writ of may be amended, where by mistake a term intervenes between the test and return. Jackson v. Crane, 1 Cow. 38.