Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

2 Johns. 381

People v. M'Lean

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 15, 1807

New York Supreme Court · decided 1807-08-15

AT the last oyer and terminer, in the county of-, J held before Mr. Justice Tompkins, the prisoner was convicted of murder. On his arraignment, he suggested his alienism, which was admitted. He then moved to put off his trial until the next court, so that a panel of jurois de medietaie linsruce, might foe made out and returned; but 6 0 the court ordered the sheriff to return such a panel m-stanter.

Cited by 2 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1986

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1807-08-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The act concerning jurors, [Laws of N. *381Y. vol. 1. p. 377. 379.) relative to the venire, and tho ejgjlt jayg f0 be allowed for summoning them, applies only to jurors drawn out of the box by the county clerk, as qualified jurors by law. It is not applicable to the case of an alien, upon a trial cle medietale lingua. Such a jury is to be summoned and impanelled, as if no statute on the subject existed. By the common law, the justices of gaol delivery might, by a mere award, without any precept, order the sheriff tó return .a panel of jurors instanter, for the trial ofa prisoner arraigned before them.* In the case of Count Koningsmark and others, tried for murder in 1681, and of Swendson,in 1702, for forcibly marrying Mrs. Rawlins, the prisoners claimed the privilege of alien, and strangers were impanneied, and tho prisoners tried on the same day. In the present case, therefore, the, proceedings of the court of oyer and ter-miner were correct and legal.

¶2Hankins, b. 2, c. 41. s. 1. and 4.

¶3 3 St. Trials, 468.

¶4 5 St. Trials, 449.

/2/johns/381 · .json · Public domain