¶1The copy of the affidavit served on the opposite attorney, need not contain the name of the magistrate before whom it was sworn. The copy served was sufficient.
¶2Rule granted.
¶3 See 3 John. Rep. 540.
2 Johns. 479
Livingston v. Cheetham
Decided November 15, 1807
New York Supreme Court · decided 1807-11-15
VAN WYCK moved for judgment, as in case of non-suit, for not bringing this cause to trial on the usual affidavit. because the copy of the affidavit, which had been served with the notice of the motion had no name signed, nor jurat.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1807-11-15
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1910
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →