Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 JOHNSCH 317 - Eastburn v. Kirk

Eastburn v. Kirk’s Empirical Analysis

1817

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
May 1918
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 1918

4 state decisions

3018171820183018401850186018701880189019001910decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Costs in equity ‘do not depend upon any statute, nor do they absolutely depend upon the event of a cause. They depend upon conscience, and upon a full and satisfactory view and determination of the whole merits of a ease. They rest in sound discretion, to be exercised under a consideration of all the circumstances.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.