Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 2 Kan. App. 2d 262 - State v. Eubanks

2 Kan. App. 2d 262 - State v. Eubanks’s Empirical Analysis

1978

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently June 2024

10 state decisions

60197819801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ogden v. United States · State v. Wilkins · State v. Johnson & Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(2) After a witness called by die state has testified on direct examination, the court shall, on motion' of the defendant, order the prosecution to produce any statement (as hereinafter defined) of die witness in die possession of the prose cution which relates to the subject matter as to which the witness has testified. If the entire contents of any such statement relate to the subject matter of the testimony of the witness, the court shall order it to be delivered directly to tire defendant for his examination and use. [[Image here]] “(4) The term ‘statement,’ as used in subsections (2) and (3) of this section in relation to any witness called by the prosecution means— (a) a written statement made by said witness and signed or otherwise adopted or approved by him; or (b) a stenographic, mechanical, electrical, or other recording, or a transcription thereof, which is a substantially verbatim recital of an oral statement made by said witness and recorded contemporaneously with the making of such oral statement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.