2 Kan. App. 2d 277 - State v. Jacques’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 2020
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Aguilar v. Texas · Jones v. United States · Rochin v. People of California · United States v. Harris · State v. Lamb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We are troubled by the language found in State v. Morgan, 222 Kan. 149, 153 , 563 P.2d 1056 (1977), where the Kansas Supreme Court stated: “ ‘Evidence of a single isolated drug sale may not give probable cause to believe drugs are present at a particular location; however, where an affidavit gives evidence of activity indicating protracted or continuous conduct at a particular location and that evidence provides a reasonable basis to infer drugs are still present, probable cause may exist.’ (Citations omitted.)””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jacques“It is within the sound discretion of the trial court to determine whether or not an adequate foundation has been laid to introduce expert testimony as well as whether the expert witness is qualified to state an opinion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Timley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.