2 Kan. App. 2d 349 - State v. Kilpatrick’s Empirical Analysis
1978
Citation profile
19 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently March 1998
19 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Kirby · State v. Holt · State v. Hamilton · State v. Blosser · 2 Kan. App. 2d 115 - State v. Kleber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““To have put before the jury the additional fact that [the stepdaughter] had been given a polygraph test and ‘failed it, and it didn’t go any farther than this’ (i.e., there was no prosecution by the State), followed shortly thereafter by the inquiry of [the daughter] as to whether she had taken a polygraph test to which she replied, ‘Yes,’ followed by the affirmative act of prosecution, was in effect to reveal to the jury the results of the test given [the daughter].””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Guesfeird v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.