2 Mass. App. Ct. 533 - Commonwealth v. Flemmi’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2006
1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Picard v. Connor · Alford v. United States · Commonwealth v. Saferian · Commonwealth v. McLaughlin · Commonwealth v. Antobenedetto
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Defendant’s Counsel: ... I point out, Your Honor, at the bench here, with regard to my previous motion for a voir dire, . the Assistant District Attorney indicated [at the first bench conference] that this witness was going to testify with regard to the telephone conversation that the [petitioner] said, “Why did you try to shoot me?” And he has not so testified during the course of that conversation. The Prosecutor: Get it on cross-examination. It’s as simple as that.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flemmi v. Gunter“Defendant’s Counsel: May I have my motion for statements . that he furnished law enforcement officers? The Judge: Well, what do you say about that? The Prosecutor: Well, Your Honor, I know of no law in this Commonwealth where statements by witnesses must be furnished to defense counsel. The Judge: “I’ll deny that motion and save your rights.” 3”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flemmi v. Gunter“1. The introduction of Abboud’s testimony about the telephone conversation with the defendant; 2. The refusal of the trial judge to permit the defendant to inspect the documents used by the prosecutor to refresh Abboud’s recollection; 3. The refusal of the trial judge to provide the defendant a copy of the tape recording itself.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Flemmi v. Gunter
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.