2 Md. App. 245 - Huber v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
47 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 1995 · most notably Prout v. State (1988), 7 Md. App. 505 - Scott v. State (1969)
47 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Carroll v. United States · Warden, Maryland Penitentiary v. Hayden · Preston v. United States · Cooper v. State of California · Schowgurow v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"When the details of the commission of a prior crime by a witness are introduced into evidence, there is a danger that the jury may be misled into a conviction by evidence of an offense for which the defendant is not indicted... and hence the introduction of such evidence should be subject to rigid scrutiny by the court. ...””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.