2 Md. App. 271 - Gamble v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently February 2008 · most notably United States v. Johnson (1970), 5 Md. App. 340 - Nichols v. State (1968)
3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Butz v. State · 1 Md. App. 85 - Anglin v. State · Braxton v. State · Anglin v. State · Edwardsen v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The requirement that goods be “recently” stolen is a relative one. In Anglin v. State, 1 Md.App. [85,] at 92 [ 227 A.2d 364 ] [ (1967) ], this court, quoting Butz v. State, 221 Md. 68, 77 [ 156 A.2d 423 (1959)], said: The term “recent” when used in connection with recently stolen goods, is a relative term, and its meaning as applied to a given case will vary with the circumstances of the case. (Citations omitted.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.