2 Md. App. 429 - Jones v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
18 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently June 1997
18 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Irvin v. Dowd · Beck v. Washington · 151 W. Va. 364 - State v. Riley · Duffy v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conceding the proposition that appellant’s right to an impartial jury is guaranteed by both Article 21 of the Maryland Declaration of Rights, Bristow v. State, 242 Md. 283, 288 [, 219 A.2d 33 ], and the Fourteenth Amendment to the Federal Constitution, Beck v. Washington, 369 U.S. 541 [, 82 S.Ct. 955 , 8 L.Ed.2d 98 ]; Irvin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 [, 81 S.Ct. 1639 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 ], it is clear that the burden of proving that the jury was in fact not impartial is on the appellant.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.