2 Md. App. 443 - Hunt v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
2 district · 10 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1985
2 district · 10 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Escobedo v. Illinois · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · 1 Md. App. 455 - Gaudio v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Inmates must of necessity surrender some of their constitutional rights so that proper prison administration and discipline may prevail. In Stewart v. State, 1 Md. App. 309, 316 , [ 229 A. 2d 727, 731 (1967)], and Smith v. State, 1 Md. App. 297, 301 , [ 229 A. 2d 723, 725 (1967)], we held that searches of inmates by prison authorities were reasonably necessary in the fulfillment of the custodian’s administrative duties. Similarly, interrogation by prison officials with relation to the maintenance of internal security and discipline and to the rules and regulations of the prison, where the thrust and purpose of the interrogation does not relate to a prosecution for any crime, does not fall within the ambit of the Miranda decision.” (Footnote omitted.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.