2 Md. App. 45 - Carwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1967
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2014 · most notably 27 Md. App. 361 - Cummings v. State (1975), 4 Md. App. 515 - Robinson v. State (1968)
4 federal appellate · 28 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · JOHNSON, ETC. v. State · 1 Md. App. 455 - Gaudio v. State · 1 Md. App. 85 - Anglin v. State · Bird v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We held in Gaudio and Bucci v. State, 1 Md. App. 455 that those safeguards applied to statements made during a ‘custodial interrogation’ and that Miranda did not protect an accused ‘under any and all circumstances * * * to the extent that no inquiry at all by the authorities is permissible without prior warning.’ In the instant case there was not even an inquiry by the police; the appellant simply ‘blurted out’ the statement to which objection was made.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.